An overall score to guide your reading
The result summarizes wording, rhythm, and structure across the passage. Use it to decide where to pay closer attention.
Detector features
A clearer review for writing that matters
Paste a draft to get an overall read on its language patterns. Then review the passage with context and your own judgment.
What is included
Tools for reviewing a draft, not issuing a verdict
Each feature is built to help you find what deserves another read. The score starts the review. It does not finish it.
Sentence detail when it is available
When the service returns a breakdown, you can see where the signal changes and review the full paragraph around those sentences.
Samples from 50 to 45,000 characters
Several paragraphs usually provide more context than one isolated sentence. The form accepts text within that range.
Patterns from current writing tools
The review looks for traits common in ChatGPT, including GPT 6, Claude, Gemini, Llama, and similar tools. It does not claim to identify an exact model.
Start without an account
Paste a draft and review the result before you register. You do not need a card to begin using the detector.
Limits stated plainly
Human writing can receive a high signal, and generated writing can go unnoticed. No score proves who wrote a passage.
A sensible way to use it
Move from a score to a better-informed review
The detector contributes one signal. Context, writing history, and a conversation still matter.
- 01
Paste a passage with context
Include several paragraphs when you can. Very short excerpts leave fewer patterns for the detector to examine.
- 02
Read the score and the detail
Look for changes in the signal, but do not pull one sentence away from the rest of the writing.
- 03
Follow with a human review
Read the work, ask for sources or drafts, and speak with the person before reaching a conclusion.
What you will see
More useful than a percentage without context
Responsible review combines a detector result with reading and context. This page is designed to support that process.
| On screen | How it can help | What it cannot tell you |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | Helps you decide which part of a passage deserves a closer read. | It cannot prove authorship. |
| Sentence signals | Show where the pattern may change within a passage. | They do not make a sentence proof on its own. |
| Character limit | Lets you review a full draft or a longer excerpt. | It does not make a context-free sample more reliable. |
| Model coverage | Considers patterns associated with several writing tools. | It does not confirm which model, if any, was used. |
For different kinds of work
Useful when applied with judgment
Students
Review a draft before submitting it and make sure the writing reflects your own ideas, sources, and voice.
Teachers
Use a signal as a reason to review and talk. Do not use it as the only basis for a grade or a penalty.
Writers and editors
Find passages that feel overly uniform and decide where more specific editing or a personal voice is needed.
Teams
Add a pattern check to an editorial process without replacing fact checks, quality review, or brand judgment.
Before you paste text
Text is sent to the detection service to produce a result. Do not paste personal data, private information, or confidential material. Read the privacy policy for details about data handling.
Common questions
The essentials, without inflated promises
Does a high score prove someone used AI?
No. A score can justify a second look or a conversation, but it cannot prove authorship on its own.
How much text should I use?
The form accepts 50 to 45,000 characters. Several paragraphs are usually more informative than a short sample.
Can it name the exact model that was used?
No. The tool evaluates language patterns and cannot reliably confirm which model produced a passage.
Should I paste sensitive material?
No. Avoid personal data, confidential content, or anything you should not send to an external service.