Support academic judgment
Use writing signals to guide a fair follow-up, not to issue an automatic penalty. Students and educators both deserve a process that values evidence and context.
For Educators
Use a result to decide where to ask about sources, drafting choices, and a student’s reasoning.
For Students
Understand why formulaic passages may draw attention and keep drafts, notes, and sources ready to discuss.
For Institutions
Set a shared policy for disclosure, follow-up, and appeals across departments and programs.
Use the result to ask better questions
An overall score hides too much. Sentence-level signals give an instructor a place to look more closely, whether that means checking citations, comparing an outline with the finished work, or asking the student to explain an argument in their own words.
The tool should never decide a case by itself. Writing style varies by language background, discipline, assignment type, and use of editing tools. Treat a result as one piece of evidence in a documented, proportionate academic process.
A workable classroom process
-
Tell students in advance when written work may be reviewed for AI-like patterns.
-
Review the draft, assignment context, and source material before drawing a conclusion.
-
Offer a clear opportunity for the student to explain their work and show their process.
Privacy starts with the assignment policy
Do not submit personal, confidential, or protected student information to a public checker. Text submitted here is sent to a detection service for analysis. Institutions should review the privacy policy, data-processing terms, and their own obligations before making detection part of a course workflow.
Discuss an institutional workflow
Frequently Asked Academic Questions
Can a checker reliably distinguish AI writing from multilingual student writing?
No tool can make that distinction with certainty. Language background, editing support, discipline conventions, and assignment structure can affect a result. Do not treat a flag as proof, particularly where the consequences for a student are serious.
How should teachers handle an AI detection flag?
Treat the score as a reason to gather more context, not as a disciplinary finding. Review the assignment, sources, drafts, and any permitted AI use. Invite the student to explain their choices, and follow your school’s normal process for documentation and appeal.
What should a school consider before submitting student work?
Avoid submitting personal, confidential, or protected data. Submitted text is sent to the detection service for analysis. Review the privacy policy, your data-governance requirements, and obtain the approvals your institution requires before using any external service.
Should students be told that detection may be used?
Yes. A clear written policy is the fair approach. Explain what is checked, how results are used, which kinds of AI assistance are allowed, and how a student can ask for a review.
Keep academic integrity human
Good policy does more than catch problems. It makes expectations visible, teaches students how to use tools responsibly, and protects their right to be heard when a result does not match their work. Detection can support that policy, but it cannot replace it.
Talk through your policy